For two decades, Outdoor Retailer has held two shows per year in Salt Lake City. And while there have been rumors in recent years it might consider leaving, recently that option has hit a fever pitch in response to political actions in Utah.
Here’s the story in a nutshell:
- Last December, President Obama approved the designation of 1.3 million acres in southeastern Utah as the Bears Ears National Monument.
- Utah’s state legislature passed a resolution – which was signed by Governor Gary Herbert on Feb. 3 – to request the Federal Government rescind that designation.
- In response, big-time Outdoor Retailer exhibitors including Patagonia, The North Face, and REI are calling for a boycott of future shows held in Utah because of what’s being referred to as “an assault on public lands.”
- Now the show has announced it is inviting other cities to submit proposals to host shows starting as early as November 2018 (the current contract runs out next summer).
- Colorado, which has courted Outdoor Retailer for some time, is now positioning itself as a better alternative and a friend of public lands. But there’s a problem with Denver hosting the show …
- As the current home to SnowSports Industries America’s Snow Show, Denver has an non-compete agreement that would keep the winter edition of Outdoor Retailer from being held around that same time. But that might not prevent the two shows from partnering up …
It will be intriguing to watch how this story develops and whether exhibitors really do pull out of the upcoming show in July. Outdoor Retailer shows have grown to attract about 29,000 attendees and result in an estimated $45 million in annual direct spending for the Utah economy, so it would be no small loss for the Salt Lake region. But Colorado is a huge outdoor sports destination, so it makes sense for the show to shift venues.
This is obviously not just a Utah/Colorado story, nor is it merely a trade show industry story. This week, I’ve seen articles popping up online everywhere from Virginia to Seattle to Miami to California. Here are a few of the most in-depth, in case you’d like to know more: The Denver Post (for the Colorado perspective), the Salt Lake Tribune (which states the show is leaving), the San Luis Obispo Tribune (a more neutral account), and the Washington Post (for detail on the public lands issue, including a short video analysis).
Update 2.24.17: The modern-day gold rush to land Outdoor Retailer continued this week with several more states joining the quest:
- Montana’s governor sent a letter pitching his state as the new home of Outdoor Retailer, which is curious since there’s no convention center there large enough to host it.
- New Mexico has also thrown their hat in the ring with a letter from one of their Senators, based on the significance of outdoor recreation and preservation of public lands in that state. But again there’s no mention of where the event would be held.
- Portland, Oregon is also preparing a proposal, which makes a lot of sense due not only to the location but also the number of outdoor gear and apparel manufacturers located in that state. But the catch there is a lack of hotel rooms.
I’ll keep you posted as this frenzied story continues to unfold!